LCA activity
Recent labor-condition rows help reveal roles, worksites, wages, and case statuses. LCA certification is not USCIS petition approval.
Imported LCA rows
0
Median wage
$90,980
Source period
FY2026 Q1
H-1B/LCA filing signal: As of source verification 2026-06-25, Schenck Process shows imported DOL labor-condition rows through FY2026 Q1 on VisaSignal. The largest role bucket is Process Controls Field Service Engineer (1 rows). The largest worksite bucket is Kansas City, MO (1 rows). Treat this as historical H-1B/LCA filing activity, not proof of USCIS petition approval or future sponsorship.
Wage range
Normalized from 1 imported LCA wage rows. DOL-disclosed offered and prevailing wages span different roles, worksites, and wage units — read the band as wage-distribution context, not a guaranteed offer or legal minimum.
25th percentile
$90,980
Median
$90,980
75th percentile
$90,980
Range
$90,980 – $90,980
H-1B evidence checklist
For searches like "Schenck Process H-1B", "Schenck Process LCA", or "does Schenck Process sponsor H-1B", read the filing count, role/worksite pattern, and status mix together before treating the employer as a lead.
For "Schenck Process H-1B" or "Schenck Process LCA" research, the imported DOL LCA row table has no matching rows through FY2026 Q1. Use the count as a historical filing signal, not a hiring promise.
Read source caveatsProcess Controls Field Service Engineer (1 rows) and Kansas City, MO (1 rows) are the strongest role and worksite signals. Compare those row-level patterns with the wage band before treating Schenck Process as relevant to your target role or location.
Compare salary signalsThe displayed rows do not yet have a dominant LCA status bucket. DOL LCA certification is not USCIS H-1B petition approval, so read the status mix with row dates and source period before treating Schenck Process as a sponsor lead. Then compare the employer against the broader H-1B sponsor database before shortlisting.
Browse H-1B sponsorsUse the full LCA and PERM database lookup when you need to search Schenck Process rows across job titles, SOC codes, worksites, and states instead of relying only on this employer summary.
Open LCA database lookupLCA query context
For searches like "Schenck Process LCA", start with the official filing count, then compare role, worksite, wage, and status signals before opening individual rows.
Process Controls Field Service Engineer is the largest imported role bucket with 1 matching rows.
Kansas City, MO is the largest imported worksite cluster with 1 matching rows.
See other H-1B sponsors in Missouri.
Imported rows have not produced a dominant status bucket yet.
No LCA rows found for this employer
Once official disclosure files are imported, this table will show case status, decision date, role, worksite, wage, and source period.
Related sponsors
Employers with imported DOL LCA or PERM filings that also list Missouri worksites, weighted toward overlapping roles. Shared filing footprints are a research and discovery signal, not a hiring or sponsorship guarantee.
Primary source
LCA rows for Schenck Process are imported from DOL OFLC LCA Disclosure Data, the official US Department of Labor disclosure dataset. See About data for source caveats and Source status for import freshness, or use the LCA and PERM database lookup to search records across employers, roles, SOC codes, cities, and states. To check whether a different company sponsors H-1B, run it through the H-1B sponsor checker or review the H-1B sponsor cost guide.
DOL OFLC performance pageDate retrieved: . Last verified: . Page updated: .
FAQ
The Schenck Process LCA page summarizes imported Department of Labor labor-condition rows for this normalized employer, including roles, worksites, wages, case statuses, and source periods.
No. LCA certification is an official DOL labor-condition filing signal, but USCIS decides H-1B petitions separately. Use the page as employer research context, not as an approval record.
Searches like "Schenck Process H-1B" or "Schenck Process H-1B sponsor" are best read against this LCA filing activity, which reflects historical labor-condition signals at Schenck Process. It is not a promise of future sponsorship or an indicator of any individual case outcome.
Yes. This Schenck Process LCA lookup view shows imported official DOL labor-condition rows for the employer, including job titles, worksites, wage fields, case statuses, and source periods. For a broader LCA lookup across employers, roles, SOC codes, cities, and states, use the LCA and PERM database lookup.
For searches like "Schenck Process H-1B salary", VisaSignal normalizes the imported LCA wage fields into a range — the 25th-to-75th-percentile band plus the lowest and highest observed values — instead of a single number. These are DOL-disclosed offered and prevailing wages spanning different roles, worksites, and wage units, so read the band as wage-distribution context, not a guaranteed offer or legal minimum.
No. A DOL-certified LCA is not the same as USCIS H-1B petition approval. It is an official labor-condition filing signal that should be interpreted with that limit.
No. PERM certification is one step in an employment-based green card process. It does not mean a green card, I-140 petition, or adjustment of status was approved.
No. Official filing history can show recent activity, roles, worksites, and wage signals, but it does not guarantee future sponsorship or predict legal outcomes.
LCA and PERM rows are filing signals, not USCIS approvals, green-card approvals, legal advice, or outcome predictions.