Role + city salary
Local wage signals can differ sharply from national role medians. Read this as historical LCA filing context, not a salary offer.
Median
$117,875
Observed range
$74,000 - $207,648
Observations
64
Observed wage range
Wage values from matching LCA rows that state an annual pay unit.
Median $117,875
All 64 matching rows with a wage figure state an annual pay unit.
Observed by wage level
A wage level sets the prevailing-wage floor on a filing. This table reports the yearly prevailing wages DOL actually accepted at each level on the imported LCA rows matching this role — the filing population, not a published national salary.
Across 55 imported DOL labor condition applications for Accountant in Chicago that state both an OES wage level and a yearly prevailing wage, this is the prevailing wage DOL accepted at each level. Median accepted prevailing wage runs from $76,544 at Level II to $91,957 at Level III. Retrieved from official US Department of Labor OFLC disclosure data on 2026-08-09.
Wage observations
55
Levels published
2 of 4
Yearly prevailing wages only
Median at the top level
$91,957
| Wage level | Filings | Lowest | 25th pct | Median | 75th pct | Highest |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level II | 28 | $76,544 | $76,544 | $76,544 | $76,544 | $76,544 |
| Level III | 27 | $91,957 | $91,957 | $91,957 | $91,957 | $91,957 |
Most of these filings — 63 of the 63 levelled rows — were filed under SOC code 13-2011.00 (Accountants and Auditors). That matters because a wage level is a percentile of the OEWS wage distribution for one SOC occupation and one area of intended employment, so these figures describe that occupation as filed, not every job that shares the title.
63 of 64 imported LCA rows matching Accountant in Chicago (98%) record an OES wage level of I through IV. A further 0 were marked N/A by the filer and 1 carry no wage-level field, which Form ETA-9035 Section F expects: an employer completes only one prevailing-wage source and only the OES option has a level. Of the levelled rows, 63 state their prevailing wage as a yearly figure and are the ones aggregated here — hourly, weekly, and monthly rows are excluded rather than converted. 1 further level matched fewer than 25 yearly rows and is left out rather than published over a handful of filings. These counts cover every matching imported row, not the most recent 1,000 sampled for the wage range higher up the page.
These are observed prevailing wages on imported DOL labor condition applications matching Accountant in Chicago, not a published wage for the role. DOL publishes the level figures per SOC occupation code and area of intended employment, and a job-title match can span more than one occupation, so read the spread rather than any single number as the answer. A prevailing wage is also a floor: the employer's offered wage on the same filing can be higher, and a certified LCA is a Department of Labor record rather than proof that USCIS approved a petition.
Employers
Matched rows from FY2026 Q2. Open a company for roles, locations, source freshness, and caveats.
Keep exploring
Compare this local wage signal with other cities, related roles, and state-level sponsor activity built from the same DOL disclosure data.
Looking at the wider market? See H-1B sponsors in IL or browse the all-states sponsor hub.
Related roles
Prefer the national picture? Open the Accountant salary overview or the full salary hub.
Primary source
Local wage values are derived from DOL OFLC LCA Disclosure Data, filtered to LCA rows matching Accountant in Chicago. See About data and Source status for caveats and import freshness.
DOL OFLC performance pageLast verified: . Page updated: .
LCA and PERM rows are filing signals, not USCIS approvals, green-card approvals, legal advice, or outcome predictions.
FAQ
The median H-1B LCA wage for Accountant in Chicago is $117,875 per year, across 64 annual wage observations in FY2026 Q2 DOL LCA disclosure data. The middle half of those filings falls between $100,391 and $145,470. This is an observed aggregate of what employers filed, not total compensation and not a legal wage-level determination. Retrieved from DOL OFLC LCA Disclosure Data on 2026-08-09.
It is a 25th-to-75th-percentile band, not a minimum and maximum: of the 64 annual wage observations matching Accountant in Chicago, a quarter were filed below $100,391 and a quarter above $145,470, so filings outside the band exist and are not errors. The band is computed only from imported DOL LCA rows carrying an annual wage, and may not represent total compensation or every worker at an employer.
Treat $117,875 as the starting point, then narrow before you rely on it. Google is the largest matched employer filing for Accountant in Chicago in this dataset, and Chicago, IL is the largest observed worksite cluster, so a single employer or metro can sit well away from the role median. Open the employer and city pages to compare counts, worksites, and source periods together. None of it is a legal minimum-salary determination or a guarantee about any individual role.
Partly, and the spread is the point: across 55 levelled filings matching Accountant in Chicago worksites, the median accepted prevailing wage runs from $76,544 at Level II to $91,957 at Level III. DOL sets each level as a percentile of the OEWS distribution for one SOC occupation and area, and a job-title match can span more than one occupation, so read the spread rather than any single figure. This remains an aggregate salary view, not a legal wage-level or minimum-salary determination.
DOL disclosure rows can contain wage ranges, prevailing wages, different wage units, and different worksites. VisaSignal normalizes cautiously and keeps source caveats visible.
No. A DOL-certified LCA is not the same as USCIS H-1B petition approval. It is an official labor-condition filing signal that should be interpreted with that limit.
No. PERM certification is one step in an employment-based green card process. It does not mean a green card, I-140 petition, or adjustment of status was approved.
No. Official filing history can show recent activity, roles, worksites, and wage signals, but it does not guarantee future sponsorship or predict legal outcomes.